There are two situations of which investors should be wary.
The first is known as a “wrap account”. In this situation,
a stock brokerage firm recommends an investment advisory firm
to an existing brokerage customer. The customer signs
a contract with the advisory firm and the brokerage firm shares
in the fees.
This is problematic for two reasons. First, wrap accounts
are frequently expensive. The customer is paying a percentage
of his/her assets every year for management and the manager
is obviously willing to accept only a portion of the fee for
actual management.
So what is the stockbroker doing for its share of the fee?
Frequently nothing. More frequently, the wrong thing.
The brokerage firm is supposed to be watching out for the
customer’s
best interests. This type of fee arrangement doesn’t
make it easy for the brokerage firm to do that. Many
customers have been told to “stay with” advisors
who are losing money because the brokerage firm doesn’t
want a change, and for no other reason.
The other type of referral from a stockbroker
to an investment advisor that is problematical, is the referral
programs from firms that “clear transactions” for
investment advisors but don’t actually monitor how
well the advisors are doing.
For example: Charles
Schwab & Co. has a network of investment
advisors that it regularly recommends to customers who ask
for a recommendation. But Schwab does nothing to monitor
the performance of the advisors it recommends so it is likely
that Schwab will recommend advisors who lose money for customers
year after year.
Stay away from referrals like this
that are nor supported by meaningful performance information. They
have limited value. |